编者按: ISACA欢迎丹尼尔Dobrygowski, the head of 治理 and trust for the World Economic Forum, 对于一个 Ask Me Anything (AMA) session on ISACA’s 参与 platform 24-28 April. Dobrygowski is an attorney and educator with two decades of experience where technology, 法律和政策交叉. He is a member of ISACA’s Digital Trust Advisory Council and oversees the World Economic Forum’s work relating to technology risk, 公司治理和数字信任. This AMA session led to a robust community discussion of topics like AI, 数字的信任, 治理, 数字民主和更多. See below for highlights from the thread, which can be 在这里找到全文 了解更多信息. To participate in the next AMA session, join the conversation on 参与!
What do 丹尼尔Dobrygowski, ISACA and the World Economic Forum have in common?
关注数字信任.
多布里戈夫斯基在论坛工作过 数字的信任 几年来, and ISACA’s community of 数字的信任 professionals was excited to pick his brain about related topics in his recent AMA session. 人工智能处于谈话的最前沿, just as it has been at the forefront of the news cycles in recent months.
When asked about the rapid rise of AI and corresponding 治理 from both the industry and regulators, Dobrygowski说, “最终, 这种监管活动源于这样一个事实, for regular individuals and the governments who represent them, many technologies have developed in ways that no longer seem trustworthy. It’s going to be incumbent on the companies developing and deploying these technologies—especially some of the tech with the potential to cause significant changes in society and business—to show why their decisions relating to those technologies are trustworthy. It’s up to the companies making the claim that regulation isn’t the answer to show what concrete, 可衡量的, and transparent steps they plan to take to earn trust for the tech they’re developing.”
Working toward transparency and 数字的信任 is for the benefit of enterprises and individuals alike. It can be difficult to know where to start learning about 数字的信任 due to its overlap with many different fields and perspectives. Dobrygowski emphasizes that adopting an interdisciplinary mindset is key when you are becoming a 数字的信任 professional, and engaging with other open minds from widely different fields with curiosity and a willingness to learn is important to the advancement of 数字的信任.
随着ISACA的发展 数字信任生态系统框架，治理是关键. 多布里戈夫斯基认识到，“我们从哪里开始?” commonly comes up in conversations about 数字的信任 and 治理, 他说一切都从领导开始. “The ISACA 数字信任生态系统框架 as well as the Forum's framework on this topic have great starting points for a conversation about the benefits of focusing on 数字的信任 for organizations,他说. “That's really where the 治理 work begins—by discussing why it is important!”
Executive commitment and leadership are critical to the success of upholding 数字的信任; therefore, avoiding overly technical jargon while explaining its importance to senior leaders is key. IT managers must find a way to communicate technical and financial issues clearly in order to secure organizational buy-in. Dobrygowski说, it is important to create an understanding that technological security and trustworthiness is in the interests of the company’s bottom line and all of its stakeholders.
“After all, 治理 and trust aren't just ends in themselves, they serve a function. 基于论坛的数字信任定义, that function is to meet peoples’ expectation that technology should ‘protect all stakeholders’ interests and uphold societal expectations and values,’”多布里高斯基说. “So, defining who those stakeholders are and understanding their values is vital. Only then do we get to talking specifically about the technologies themselves and what to do about them in order to achieve our goals (which must include earning trust).”
Beyond business, 数字的信任 also has an essential place in well-functioning democracy. Social media and trustworthy technology have a great effect on elections and government, and Dobrygowski说 that 数字的信任 is important to the protection of civil society. From his time working for a presidential campaign in the 2012 election, 多布里戈夫斯基深入了解了法律, policy and technological issues arising from the patchwork of US election systems. Digital trust and digital democracy are deeply entwined.
“We're in the midst of what I call the ‘digital disruption of democracy,’ and it's incumbent on every person who believes in the vitality of democratic processes to do what they can to shore up trust in democratic systems,他说. “这是合法的。, 社会及政策影响, 但它也有技术含义——即, we need to make sure tech is more trustworthy before we inflict it on society, especially for the most vital functions—and that includes digital public infrastructure (like elections and provision of social services).”
